@lightacandle wrote:
The State Department did not train Hillary on the 3 levels of intelligence security. It's not their job. It's the job of the FBI and she signed documents at the end of each stage of the training stating she completely understood what she was being taught. Part of the duties of the Secretary of State is to be able to determine how documents should be classified and to then mark them correctly. That's why she has no credibility when she states the documents weren't marked. She was trained to understand that most documents regarding sensitive material are... automatically classified... on one of those 3 levels... at the time they are created.
Also when she told the public the documents were unmarked, she knew many people would not know that before her staff could forward those documents to her private server from a government server, the security level had to be removed. Her staff did that for her under her instruction, leaving the documents unprotected if the private server would happen to be hacked. As the Secretary of State, she was the only one in that department who could give them those directions.
.
Before the decision by the FBI was released I had wondered how she was going to answer any questions at all because she was lying about everything. Lying to the FBI is a felony. Within 48 hours after the decision, a Congressional Committee asked Director Comey to appear before them to explain his decision under oath. It was at that time I learned lying to the FBI was no problem for Hillary because the FBI didn't even put her under oath. Also, there had been a change in FBI interrogation procedures requiring that interviews be filmed. Once again this was a procedure that was waived for the Red Queen.